On the topic of the previous blog, I don't think anyone would have picked up "Twilight", if it had the original cover art. (as seen here, they really do suck) It just goes to show you that even though you try to avoid it, you'll still end up judging a book by it's cover.
Notice these pretty cool pieces of literature with un-crappy covers:
- The Watchmen, By Alan Moore (I couldn't find his website, but enjoy his wiki page here)
- Fragile Things, By Neil Gaiman (the paper back admittedly wasn't up to par, if you want Gaiman's site enjoy this clicky)
- A Clockwork Orange, By Anthony Burgess (Anthony died in '93, so enjoy his wiki also here)
- 1984, By George Orwell (wiki him here)
- The Giving Tree, By Shel Silverstein (his books here, a bit juvenile I know, but admittedly a tree that talks is pretty out there)
Still no word from the submission front, but probably if I got to writing instead of working, I'd do tons better.
I'm not sure where the title comes from, but it's a valid point. People are judgmental, it sucks but we are. That's why I'm glad that now I shop for books by title or author. I don't get the pleasure of happening upon a strange book that grows on me, but I don't get heartbroken by a horrible book.
ReplyDeleteActually... the title is a bit odd isn't it? It actually came from a show I was watching while posting, the guy was memorizing cards and used things in his childhood (lightening fast) to identify them, and then reorder them (even faster). He stated the objects or scenes in his life that inspired them, and one was "planting a flag" in a garden when he was a little boy. I thought it was endearing, and as much as I'd like to think I title my works appropriately, mostly they're just down right silly.
ReplyDelete